Our own servers in Europe · GDPR · Support in your language

Sector · food and drink

Food quality without folders or audit surprises

A living HACCP, prerequisites with same-day records, traceability rebuilt in minutes and supplier paperwork kept current. All on one system, whether you are audited under IFS, BRCGS or FSSC 22000.

What every protocol has in common

The food industry has a legal obligation — HACCP under Regulation (EC) 852/2004 — and on top of it whichever certification its customer demands: IFS Food, BRCGS or FSSC 22000. What is rarely said is that the underlying work for all three is practically the same: living prerequisites, critical point monitoring with daily records, allergen control and traceability that rebuilds quickly. Building that once, properly, is what stops every audit from becoming a project.

Content reviewed on

Baseline obligation
HACCP, art. 5 of Regulation (EC) 852/2004 For every food business operator except primary production
Traceability
Art. 18 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002 Identify the immediate supplier and customer of each batch
Recognised protocols
IFS Food, BRCGS and FSSC 22000 All three hold GFSI recognition
HACCP methodology
Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969 2020 revision: 7 principles across 12 steps
Feed
Regulation (EC) 183/2005 and GMP+ Feed hygiene and the sector scheme

What it solves


What the auditor asks for and is never to hand

  • HACCP plan with hazard analysis, CCPs and documented critical limits
  • Batch monitoring records, with the deviation and its corrective action
  • Allergen matrix per product, updated when a specification changes
  • Mock recall with affected batches and customers in minutes
  • Certificates of analysis generated from the real batch data
  • Supplier documentation with expiry watched and automatic blocking
  • Cleaning and pest control plans with daily records
  • Hygiene training per worker, with its expiry date
QUALITY DASHBOARD 6 AUDITS THIS YEAR 2 pending closure 3 OPEN NON-CONFORMITIES Root cause under way 11 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 8 verified, 3 on schedule INDICATORS PER PROCESS Customer satisfaction 92% On-time deliveries 96% Complaints per order 74% MANAGEMENT REVIEW, PRE-GENERATED Audits, non-conformities and indicators ready for the meeting LIVING DOCUMENTATION · ONE PLATFORM FOR ALL YOUR STANDARDS

Real examples


Where a food audit comes apart

Meat processing · IFS Food

CCP records signed after the fact

Before The cooking monitoring sheet is filled in from memory at the end of the shift. The auditor notices the handwriting and ink are identical all day.

After The operator logs the reading at the machine as it happens, with its real time. A deviation opens the corrective action on its own.

Canning · BRCGS

Allergens on a four-year-old specification

Before A supplier reformulated an ingredient and nobody revisited the matrix. The product has carried the wrong declaration for months.

After The specification expires and is requested from the supplier. A new version triggers a review of the products that use it.

Ready meals · FSSC 22000

The half-day mock recall

Before Rebuilding a batch traceability means cross-checking delivery notes, production sheets and dispatches by hand.

After The query returns affected raw materials and customers instantly. The mock recall stops costing a day.

Frequently asked questions


What people ask us before getting started

Does it work if I am audited under both IFS and BRCGS?

Yes, and it is common for anyone selling to continental and British retail. The underlying work — HACCP, prerequisites, traceability, allergens — is shared; what changes is the presentation and a few requirements specific to each protocol.

How long does a mock recall take?

With batches linked, the query is immediate: from finished product up to raw materials and down to the customers who received it. The time goes on deciding what to do, not hunting delivery notes.

How is the allergen matrix controlled?

Every reference requires a current specification with its declaration. If a supplier reformulates and uploads a new version, it triggers a review of the products that use it, which is where the chain usually breaks.

Does it work for a small business?

HACCP is mandatory from day one under Regulation (EC) 852/2004, whatever the size. What the rule allows is flexibility in how it is documented according to the risk of the activity, and that is configurable.

What about chill store temperature records?

They are logged like any other monitoring, with a limit and an alert on deviation. If it helps, the daily close can be sealed on a blockchain so the evidence does not rest solely on the company system.

Does it connect to the ERP for batches?

Yes. Typically the ERP owns the batch and the dispatch, and Kimobox consumes that data to hang the quality records and certificates off it.

Does it cover GMP+ for feed?

Yes. The feed safety module shares the structure: HACCP applied to animal nutrition, supplier control, limits on undesirable substances and monitoring plans.

What happens when a protocol issues a new version?

The affected checklists and records are adjusted, not the whole system. IFS, BRCGS and FSSC change every few years and the site regulatory calendar records the dates from which the previous one is no longer audited.

Get ready for your next food audit

We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.

Request a demo

Sources


Where each figure comes from

References to the official text in force. If a standard is revised, this page is updated and the review date says so.

  1. Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs EUR-Lex · 29 de abril de 2004
  2. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, art. 18 (traceability) EUR-Lex · 28 de enero de 2002
  3. General Principles of Food Hygiene, CXC 1-1969 Codex Alimentarius (FAO/OMS) · Revisión de 2020
  4. Schemes recognised by the Global Food Safety Initiative GFSI · Listado oficial

Quality software for the food industry

Kimobox is quality software for the food industry that keeps HACCP alive — hazard analysis, critical control points, limits and batch monitoring — alongside prerequisite programmes, allergen control and traceability in both directions.

The same system serves audits under IFS Food, BRCGS, FSSC 22000 and GMP+, because the underlying work all four protocols demand is common and only the presentation changes.