Our own servers in Europe · GDPR · Support in your language

Templates and records · ISO 22000 · Clause 8.3

ISO 22000 traceability and mock recall template

Pick a batch and rebuild, as quickly as possible, where its raw materials came from, how much was produced and who it was delivered to. Then check that the quantities add up.

In one sentence

The traceability and mock recall exercise tests the system by tracing a batch backwards and forwards, with its response time and the balance between raw materials and product, because ISO 22000 requires traceability (8.3) and the effectiveness of the withdrawal programme (8.9.5) to be verified and tested, and the evidence retained for at least the shelf life of the product.

Content reviewed on

Where the standard requires it
ISO 22000 · Clause 8.3 Clauses are cited using the numbering of ISO 22000:2018, the current edition. ISO is preparing a third edition that may renumber them; when it is published it will have its own transition period.
Type of information
Mandatory record Evidence of traceability (8.3) and withdrawal (8.9.5) to be retained
Who fills it in
Quality, with logistics and production The designated recall team should take part so that the exercise also tests the response
When
At the frequency the company sets At least once a year is usual; some customers ask for more
How long it is kept
At least the shelf life of the product It is the only period the standard sets (8.3). For long-life products that period governs; for fresh products it is worth extending it to the certification cycle.

What the standard requires


What ISO 22000 demands and what it leaves to your judgement

The traceability system must identify incoming material from suppliers and the first stage of distribution of the end product, taking into account the relationship between batches of raw materials, intermediate and end products, rework and distribution. The evidence is retained for at least the shelf life of the product, and the effectiveness of the system is verified and tested. The standard suggests, where appropriate, reconciling the quantities of end product with those of ingredients.

For withdrawal, top management appoints people with authority to initiate and carry it out, and arrangements are set for notifying interested parties, including the authorities, and for handling withdrawn product. Its effectiveness is verified, for example through mock recalls, and the outcome is retained.

The standard does not set the frequency or maximum time for the exercise; customers or certification schemes usually ask for them. In the European Union, Article 18 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002 requires one-step-back, one-step-forward traceability.

Structure


Fields the template should include

  • Date, start time and scenario simulated
  • Starting batch and direction: backward, forward or both
  • Raw materials and supplier batches identified
  • Production: intermediate batches, rework and quantity produced
  • Dispatches: customers, dates and quantities
  • Mass balance: inputs, outputs, stock and losses
  • Total response time
  • Communication test: customer and authority contacts checked
  • Problems found and improvement actions
  • Participants and signature

Example


Example: exercise on a batch of pumpkin soup

Company, people and figures are fictitious: the example only shows what a properly completed record looks like.

Field Content
Scenario Notice from a supplier: possible presence of undeclared celery in a batch of vegetable stock
Starting batch Vegetable stock, supplier batch CV-2602 · forward direction
Production Used in pumpkin soup batches L26-064 and L26-065: 4,800 tubs
Dispatches Three customers: 4,200 tubs; in own warehouse, 560
Mass balance 4,800 produced = 4,200 dispatched + 560 in stock + 40 samples and losses · reconciles
Time 38 minutes from the notice to having the customer list
Communication Emergency phone numbers for the three customers checked; one out of date
Improvement Update emergency contacts on the customer record and review them every six months

At the audit


Mistakes auditors commonly flag

  • The exercise identifies customers but does not reconcile the quantities.
  • An easy batch is always chosen, with no rework or shared raw materials.
  • Only the paperwork is tested, not communication with customers and authorities.
  • Traceability records are destroyed before the product's shelf life has expired.
  • Problems found in the exercise do not lead to any actions.

In Kimobox


How this record is kept in Kimobox

  1. 1Raw material, production and dispatch batches are linked, and backward and forward queries are instant.
  2. 2The mock recall returns the list of affected batches and customers with its response time.
  3. 3Quality certificates and records hang off the batch and can be retrieved years later.
  4. 4If the ERP owns the batch, Kimobox consumes that data to attach the records to it.

Frequently asked questions


What people ask us before getting started

How often should an exercise be run?

ISO 22000 does not set a frequency: it asks you to test the effectiveness of the system. Once a year is usual, and many customers and private schemes require specific frequencies or times that are worth writing into the procedure.

What is a mass balance?

Comparing the quantity of raw material consumed with the quantity of product produced, dispatched, in stock and lost. If it does not reconcile, traceability has a gap even if it found the customers.

Keep your ISO 22000 records without loose templates

We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.

Request a demo

Sources


Where each figure comes from

References to the official text in force. If a standard is revised, this page is updated and the review date says so.

  1. ISO 22000:2018 — Food safety management systems. Requirements for any organization in the food chain ISO · 2018 ed., with Amd 1:2024
  2. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, Articles 18 and 19 (traceability and withdrawal) EUR-Lex · 28 January 2002