Templates and records · BRCGS · Clause 3.5.1
BRCGS raw material and supplier risk assessment
First the risk of each raw material is assessed; that risk then determines how the supplier is approved and what is checked at goods-in.
In one sentence
The BRCGS raw material and supplier risk assessment analyses each raw material or group against its hazards — allergens, foreign bodies, microbiology, chemicals, substitution or fraud — and, depending on the outcome, sets how the supplier is approved — GFSI-recognised certification, audit or, for low risk only, a questionnaire — and which controls apply at goods-in, because clause 3.5.1 is a fundamental requirement.
- Where the standard requires it
- BRCGS · Clause 3.5.1 Clause references follow the numbering of BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9. If your audit is already against a later issue, check the correspondence on brcgs.com.
- Type of information
- Mandatory record Record to be retained (3.5.1, fundamental requirement)
- Who fills it in
- Quality, with purchasing The risk assessment is done by quality or the HACCP team; approval by quality
- When
- Before purchasing and at least every three years Also after a change, a new risk or a related recall
- How long it is kept
- Shelf life plus 12 months, at least BRCGS requires a retention period to be set taking into account legislation, the customer and the product's shelf life, and as a minimum records must be kept for the shelf life plus twelve months (3.3).
What the standard requires
What BRCGS demands and what it leaves to your judgement
BRCGS requires a documented risk assessment of each raw material or group of raw materials, packaging included, considering at least allergen contamination, foreign bodies, microbiological and chemical contamination, substitution or fraud, and any risk linked to legal requirements. The assessment is the basis of the approval procedure and of goods-in controls.
It is reviewed when the raw material, process or supplier changes, when a new risk emerges, after a recall affecting that raw material and, in any case, at least every three years.
Supplier approval rests on current certification to a GFSI-recognised scheme, on a supplier audit or, only where the assessment justifies a low risk, on a questionnaire. Ongoing performance monitoring follows.
Structure
Fields the template should include
- Raw material or group, packaging included
- Hazards assessed: allergens, foreign bodies, microbiology, chemicals, fraud, legal
- Risk level and justification
- Supplier approval method and evidence
- Resulting goods-in controls: testing, certificates, inspection
- Supplier performance monitoring
- Date of assessment and next review
Example
Example: assessment of skimmed milk powder for a fictitious sauce plant
Company, people and figures are fictitious: the example only shows what a properly completed record looks like.
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Raw material | Skimmed milk powder · supplier Northern Dairies (fictitious) |
| Allergens | Milk (declared intrinsic allergen) · traces of soya at the supplier's plant |
| Microbiology | Medium risk: Salmonella and Cronobacter in dairy powder |
| Fraud | Low-medium risk: addition of whey or melamine, according to sector alerts |
| Level | High |
| Approval | Current FSSC 22000 certificate · own audit in 2025 |
| Goods-in | Certificate of analysis per batch and own Salmonella test every 10 batches |
| Review | March 2026 · next in March 2029, or sooner if anything changes |
At the audit
Mistakes auditors commonly flag
- A single generic assessment for every raw material.
- Fraud or substitution risk is not considered.
- High-risk suppliers approved on a questionnaire alone.
- The assessment has not been reviewed for more than three years.
- Goods-in controls that do not match the assessed risk.
In Kimobox
How this record is kept in Kimobox
- 1Each raw material has its risk assessment and its approved supplier in the supplier portal.
- 2Supplier certificates are tracked for expiry; if an essential one lapses, the supplier is blocked.
- 3The three-yearly review and change-triggered reviews are scheduled with advance warning.
- 4Goods-in rejections and nonconformities raised against the supplier feed its ongoing evaluation.
Frequently asked questions
What people ask us before getting started
When is a questionnaire enough to approve a supplier?
Only when the raw material risk assessment justifies that the risk is low. In all other cases BRCGS expects a GFSI-recognised certification or a supplier audit.
How often must the risk assessment be reviewed?
After any significant change, a new risk or a recall affecting the raw material, and in any case at least every three years.
Is packaging assessed too?
Yes. Packaging materials, especially food-contact ones, are included in the risk assessment and in supplier approval.
Keep your BRCGS records without loose templates
We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.
Keep exploring
Related pages
Food fraud vulnerability assessment
How to document the food fraud vulnerability assessment FSSC 22000 requires (2.5.4): exposed raw materials…
GMP+ feed supplier approval
How to purchase under GMP+: suppliers with a GMP+ or accepted equivalent certificate, gatekeeper protocols…
IFS Food supplier evaluation and approval
How to approve and re-evaluate suppliers under IFS Food: risk-based criteria, GFSI certificates, performance…
Food safety and quality management system
BRCGS's documentation system holds up the HACCP plan: procedures, specifications and traceability that gets…
Sources
Where each figure comes from
References to the official text in force. If a standard is revised, this page is updated and the review date says so.
- BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety, Issue 9 BRCGS · Published August 2022
- Schemes recognised by the Global Food Safety Initiative GFSI · Official list